Journal of Surgical Education
Volume 67, Issue 2 , Pages 66-70, March 2010

Performance Goals on Simulators Boost Resident Motivation and Skills Laboratory Attendance

Presented at the Surgical Forum on Education, American College of Surgeons, San Francisco, CA, October 2008.

  • Dimitrios Stefanidis, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina
    • Carolinas Simulation Center, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Inquiries to Dimitrios Stefanidis, MD, Carolinas Simulation Center, Division of Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, 1000 Blythe Boulevard, MEB 601, Charlotte, NC 28203; tel: (704) 355-5114; fax: (704) 355-5619
  • ,
  • Christina E. Acker

      Affiliations

    • Carolinas Simulation Center, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina
  • ,
  • Frederick L. Greene, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina

published online 22 April 2010.

Objective

To assess the impact of setting simulator training goals on resident motivation and skills laboratory attendance.

Design

Residents followed a proficiency-based laparoscopic curriculum on the 5 Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery and 9 virtual reality tasks. Training goals consisted of the average expert performance on each task + 2 SD (mandatory) and best expert performance (optional). Residents rated the impact of the training goals on their motivation on a 20-point visual analog scale. Performance and attendance data were analyzed and correlated (Spearman's). Data are reported as medians (range).

Setting

General Surgery residency program at a regional referral Academic Medical Center.

Participants

General surgery residents (n = 15).

Results

During the first 5 months of the curriculum, weekly attendance rate was 51% (range, 8-96). After 153 (range, 21-412) repetitions, resident speed improved by 97% (range, 18-230), errors improved by 17% (range, 0-24), and motion efficiency by 59% (range, 26-114) compared with their baseline. Nine (60%) residents achieved proficiency in 7 (range, 3-14) and the best goals in 3.5 (range, 1-9) tasks; the other 6 residents had attendance rates <30%. Residents rated the impact of setting performance goals on their motivation as 15 (range, 1-18) and setting a best goal as 13 (range, 1-18). Motivation ratings correlated positively with attendance rates, number of repetitions, performance improvement, and achievement of proficiency and best goals (r = 0.59-0.75; p < 0.05) but negatively with postgraduate year (PGY) (−0.67; p = 0.02).

Conclusions

Setting training goals on simulators are associated with improved resident motivation to participate in a simulator curriculum. While more stringent goals may potentiate this effect, they have a limited impact on senior residents. Further research is needed to investigate ways to improve skills laboratory attendance.

Key Words: skills training, proficiency-based training, goal directed curriculum, skills laboratory attendance

Competency: Practice Based Learning

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The authors have no financial or personal relationships with people or organizations that could inappropriately bias their work. No financial support was received for this study.

PII: S1931-7204(10)00025-5

doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2010.02.002

Journal of Surgical Education
Volume 67, Issue 2 , Pages 66-70, March 2010