Journal of Surgical Education
Volume 67, Issue 1 , Pages 9-13, January 2010

Does Participation in Graduate Medical Education Contribute to Improved Patient Outcomes as Outlined by Surgical Care Improvement Project Guidelines?

  • Axel Thors, DO

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Good Samaritan Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Inquiries to Axel Thors, DO, c/o Amy Engel, Department of Surgery, Good Samaritan Hospital, 375 Dixmyth Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45220; fax: (513) 487-4643
  • ,
  • Erik Dunki-Jacobs, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Good Samaritan Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio
  • ,
  • Amy M. Engel, MA

      Affiliations

    • E. Kenneth Hatton, MD, Institute for Research and Education, Cincinnati, Ohio
  • ,
  • Sarah McDonough, BS

      Affiliations

    • E. Kenneth Hatton, MD, Institute for Research and Education, Cincinnati, Ohio
  • ,
  • Richard E. Welling, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Good Samaritan Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio

published online 08 February 2010.

Background

Patient quality outcomes are a major focus of the health care industry. It is unknown what effect involvement in graduate medical education (GME) has on patient outcomes. The purpose of this study is to begin to examine whether GME involvement in postoperative care impacts patient quality outcomes.

Methods

The retrospective cohort included all patients who underwent a nonemergent colectomy from January 1, 2007 to January 1, 2008 at a 2-hospital system. Data collected included patient demographics, patient quality outcomes, complications, and GME involvement. Patient quality outcomes were based on compliance with the Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) guidelines.

Results

A total of 159 nonemergent colectomies were analyzed. The GME group accounted for 116 (73%) patients. A significant difference was found in several SCIP process-based measures of quality when comparing the GME group with the non-GME group. Postoperative antibiotics were more likely to be stopped within 24 hours (p = 0.010), and preoperative heparin and postoperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis were more likely to be administered (p < 0.001). Additionally, patients in the GME group showed improved quality outcomes as there were significantly fewer postoperative complications (p < 0.001) and a shorter duration of stay (p = 0.008). The use of gastrointestinal prophylaxis was more common in the non-GME group (p = 0.002). No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups in respect to age, sex, diabetes, preoperative antibiotics, antibiotics, 1 hour before surgery, postoperative antibiotics, and continuation of home β blockade.

Conclusions

GME at teaching institutions has a positive impact on patient quality outcomes. At our institution, many of the SCIP measurable outcomes had improved compliance if an attending physician participated in the GME program.

Key Words: graduate medical education, surgical care improvement project(SCIP), patient quality outcomes

Competency: Patient Care, Practice Based Learning and Improvement, Systems Based Practice

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1931-7204(09)00199-8

doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2009.12.002

Journal of Surgical Education
Volume 67, Issue 1 , Pages 9-13, January 2010