Journal of Surgical Education
Volume 67, Issue 1 , Pages 52-57, January 2010

Use of the Surgical Council on Resident Education (SCORE) Curriculum as a Template for Evaluating and Planning a Program's Clinical Curriculum

  • Jonathan Fryer, MD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Inquiries to Jonathan Fryer, MD, Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 675 North Street Clair Ave, Suite 17-200, Chicago, IL60611; fax: 312-695-9194
  • ,
  • Noreen Corcoran, MPPM
  • ,
  • Debra DaRosa, PhD

Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois

published online 08 February 2010.

Background

The SCORE curriculum defines surgical operations/procedures that residents are expected to be competent with by the end of the residency.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to conduct a gap analysis to determine how well the operative experience in a general surgery residency program approximates the expectations of the SCORE curriculum, especially regarding those procedures considered essential to general surgical training.

Design

Setting/Participants: Final ACGME resident operative experience reports of recent Northwestern University general surgery program graduates (n = 15) were compared with the specific procedures and procedure levels (ie, Essential-Common, Essential-Uncommon, Complex) defined in the SCORE curriculum. The average numbers of individual SCORE procedures and procedures per SCORE procedure level performed per resident were summarized using descriptive statistics.

Results

During their 5 years of training general surgery residents logged a mean of 1025.7 (SD 152.9) primary procedures per resident. We were able to match 87.1% of these ACGME logged procedures with specific procedures identified in the SCORE curriculum. On average, of the Essential-common procedures, 23 (35%) were performed >10 times and 35 (53%) were performed >five times. Conversely, the number of Essential-uncommon and Complex procedures performed >five times were 3 (5%) and 10 (7%), respectively. Several procedures identified in the SCORE curriculum were performed at very low frequency during residency training.

Conclusions

This experience suggests that leadership at SCORE and the ACGME need to make the curriculum and logging system compatible and that surgical residents need to be better educated with regards to case logging. Despite these issues, important differences appeared to exist between actual resident operative experiences and expectations set by the SCORE curriculum. Based on these finding we advocate that similar gap analyses be performed at other surgical residency training programs to identify discrepancies between program experience and SCORE curriculum expectations.

Keywords: case log, operations, procedures, SCORE curriculum, surgical residency

Competency: Patient Care, Medical Knowledge, Practice Based Learning and Improvement

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1931-7204(09)00189-5

doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2009.11.001

Journal of Surgical Education
Volume 67, Issue 1 , Pages 52-57, January 2010