Journal of Surgical Education
Volume 66, Issue 6 , Pages 330-335, November 2009

Four-Year Experience with a Regional Program Providing Simulation-Based Endovascular Training for Vascular Surgery Fellows

  • David L. Dawson, MD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Inquiries to David L. Dawson, MD, UC Davis Vascular Center, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California, 4860 Y Street, Suite 3400, Sacramento, CA 95817; fax: (916) 734-2026
  • ,
  • Eugene S. Lee, MD
  • ,
  • Nasim Hedayati, MD
  • ,
  • William C. Pevec, MD

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California

published online 28 September 2009.

Purpose

High-fidelity procedure simulation has been found useful for training vascular surgery residents in endovascular procedures, but the costs of acquiring, maintaining, and operating simulators represent a barrier to routine use of endovascular simulation in vascular surgery programs. Providing simulation training opportunities through regional centers may make simulation more cost effective, but the costs and benefits of this approach have not been reported previously. We reviewed participation costs in a regional simulation program to provide a benchmark for comparison with other training options.

Methods

Simulation-based training was offered annually from 2004 to 2007 to the 11 vascular surgery fellowships in Washington, Oregon, California, Arizona, and Utah. Participation was at the discretion of the program directors and fellows. Sessions were designed to offer individualized, hands-on training with 2-4 participants per 2-day session. SimSuite (Medical Simulation Corporation, Denver, Colorado) simulators were used.

Results

During the 4-year period, participation by invited programs averaged 75%. Ten of 11 programs in the western United States region participated, with 34 fellows participating during the 4 years of the program. In addition, 2 program directors or faculty attended sessions to participate as learners, and 8 other individuals were allowed to participate (including 7 senior surgery residents and 1 vascular surgery fellow from out of the region). The average participant costs for travel, which include transportation, lodging, and meals, were $571. Simulation facility expenses, which included use of the simulator, computer-based training modules, and instructional support by an educational specialist, averaged $1055 per participant. Surgical faculty spent 12 hours per 2-day session instructing and in other direct educational activities. Costs for this time were not calculated separately.

Conclusions

Vascular surgery fellows' participation in simulation training at regional centers offers program directors a lower cost alternative for providing high-fidelity simulation training, compared with acquiring and operating an endovascular procedure simulator at their individual institutions.

Key Words: catheterization, stents, computer simulation, computer-assisted instruction, educational measurement, clinical competence, psychomotor performance

Competency: Medical Knowledge, Practice Based Learning and Improvement, Systems Based Practice

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1931-7204(09)00109-3

doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2009.07.004

Journal of Surgical Education
Volume 66, Issue 6 , Pages 330-335, November 2009