Journal of Surgical Education
Volume 65, Issue 5 , Pages 340-345, September 2008

Evaluation of Selective Treatment of Penetrating Abdominal Trauma

  • Thomas M. Schmelzer, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina
  • ,
  • Gamal Mostafa, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Inquiries to Gamal Mostafa, MD, Department of Surgery/MEB 601, Carolinas Medical Center, 1000 Blythe Boulevard, Charlotte, NC 28203; fax: (704) 355-5619
  • ,
  • Oliver L. Gunter Jr, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina
  • ,
  • H. James Norton, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biostatistics, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina
  • ,
  • Ronald F. Sing, DO

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina

published online 26 August 2008.

Objective

In penetrating abdominal trauma, diagnostic imaging and the application of selective clinical management may avoid negative celiotomy and improve outcome.

Design

We prospectively observed patients with penetrating abdominal trauma over 15 months and recorded demographics, presentation, imaging, surgical procedure, and outcome. Patients who underwent immediate laparotomy were compared with patients who were observed and/or had a computed tomography (CT) scan. Outcomes of negative versus positive and immediate versus delayed celiotomy were compared. Chi-square and Student t tests were used. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.

Setting

A level 1 trauma center.

Participants

Adult patients who presented with penetrating abdominal injury.

Results

In all, 100 consecutive patients (mean age, 32 years) were included (male:female, 91:9; gunshot wound:stab wound, 65:35). Overall, 60 immediate and 10 delayed laparotomies were performed; 30 patients did not undergo surgery. Predictors of immediate celiotomy were hypotension (p = 0.03), anteriorly located entrance wounds (p = 0.0005), and transaxial wounds (p = 0.03). Overall morbidity and mortality was 32% and 2%, respectively. The negative celiotomy rate was 25%. Patients with a positive celiotomy had higher morbidity (p = 0.006) and longer hospital length of stay (p = 0.003) compared with negative celiotomy. A CT scan was employed in 32% of patients, with 100% sensitivity and 94% specificity. Delayed celiotomy (10%) did not adversely impact morbidity (p = 0.70) and was 100% therapeutic, with no deaths.

Conclusion

Nonselective immediate celiotomy for penetrating abdominal trauma results in a high rate of unnecessary surgery. Hemodynamically stable patients can safely be observed and/or have contrast CT scans and undergo delayed celiotomy, if indicated. This selective treatment had no adverse effect on patient outcomes and can potentially improve overall outcome.

Key Words: penetrating trauma, nonoperative management, abdominal injuries, penetrating wounds, computed tomography, prospective study

Competency: Practice Based Learning and Improvement

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1931-7204(08)00182-7

doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2008.06.008

Journal of Surgical Education
Volume 65, Issue 5 , Pages 340-345, September 2008