« Previous
Next »
Journal of Surgical Education
Volume 65, Issue 1
, Pages 8-16
, January 2008
Surgical Resident Peer Evaluations–What Have We Learned
References
- . http://www.acgme.org/outcome/project/OutIntro.htmAccessed March 19, 2007
- . The 360-degree Evaluation: Increased Work with Little Return?. Ph.D. Current Surgery. 2004;06.024
- . Assessing competency in surgery: where to begin?. Surgery. 2004;135(1):6–20
- . Initial use of a novel instrument to measure professionalism in surgical residents. Ph.D. The American Journal of Surgery. 2005;189:479–487
- . The ethics of caring and medical education. Acad Med. 2000;75:127–132
- Teaching the human dimensions of care in clinical settings. JAMA. 2001;286(9):1067–1074
- . Working with emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam Books; 1998;
- . The effect of physician behavior on the collection of data. Ann Intern Med. 1984;101:692–696
- . Implementing the ACGME General Competencies in a Cardiothoracic Surgery Residency Program Using a 360-Degree Feedback. Ann Thoracic Surg. 2004;77:12–17
- . Physician patient communication (The relationship with malpractice claims among primary care physicians and surgeons). JAMA. 1997;277(7):553–559
- . Superior surgical residents: Who are they?. Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons. 1983;March
- . Resident selection: what’s the problem?. In: Langley DG editors. How to Select Residents. Evanston, Illinois: American Board of Medical Specialties; 1988;p. 25–36
- . Are you a surgical role model?. Curr Surg. 2004;61:111–115
- . Ratings of Surgical Residents by Self, Supervisors and Peers. Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics. 1989;December. Volume 169
- . Are you ready for 360?. Suffolk University, Spring, 1999 http:/www.work911.com/performance/particles/360htm
PII: S1931-7204(07)00242-5
doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2007.10.002
© 2008 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Journal of Surgical Education
Volume 65, Issue 1
, Pages 8-16
, January 2008
