Journal of Surgical Education
Volume 64, Issue 4 , Pages 199-203, July 2007

Training Physicians for Combat Casualty Care on the Modern Battlefield

  • Vance Y. Sohn, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, Washington
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Inquiries to Robert M. Rush, Jr., MD, Department of Surgery, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, WA 98431
  • ,
  • Lloyd A. Runser, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Family Medicine, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, Washington
  • ,
  • Robert A. Puntel, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatrics, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, Washington
  • ,
  • James A. Sebesta, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, Washington
  • ,
  • Alec C. Beekley, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, Washington
  • ,
  • Jennifer L. Theis, CVT

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Investigation, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, Washington
  • ,
  • Nancy L. Merrill, DVM

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Investigation, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, Washington
  • ,
  • Bernard J. Roth, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Graduate Medical Education, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, Washington
  • ,
  • Robert M. Rush Jr., MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, Washington

Introduction

Trauma training among nonsurgical physicians in the military is highly variable in amount and quality. However, all deployed military physicians, regardless of specialty, are expected to provide combat casualty care. The goal was to assess the effectiveness of an intense modular trauma refresher course for nonsurgical physicians deploying to a combat zone.

Methods

All graduating nonsurgical residents participated in this 2.5-day course, consisting of 4 modules: (1) didactic session; (2) simulation with interactive human surgical simulators; (3) case presentations and triage scenarios from Iraq/Afghanistan with associated skill stations; and (4) live tissue surgical procedure laboratory. Competency tests, surveys, and after action comments were reviewed and compared before and after course completion.

Results

Between May 2005 and April 2007, 60 physicians participated in the course. By specialties, there were 32 internists, 16 pediatricians, 7 general practitioners, 4 obstetricians/gynecologists, and 1 “other” nonsurgical physician represented. Precourse and postcourse tests were administered to 31 of 60 participants. The mean test scores improved from 76% to 96% upon completion of the course (p < 0.01). Additionally, self-perceived confidence levels in handling battlefield casualties from questionnaires based on Likert scale responses (1 = not confident, 5 = confident) improved from an average of 2.3 before the course to 3.9 upon completion of the course (p < 0.01).

Conclusion

All military physicians must be prepared to manage combat casualties. This hybrid training model may be an effective method to prepare nonsurgeons to deal with battle injuries. This course significantly improved the knowledge and confidence among primary care physicians.

Key Words: training, trauma, education, simulation, animal model, combat care

Competency: Patient Care, Medical Knowledge, Practice Based Learning and Improvement

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The opinions expressed herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or reflecting of the views of the Department of Defense or the Department of Army.

PII: S1931-7204(07)00127-4

doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2007.05.007

Journal of Surgical Education
Volume 64, Issue 4 , Pages 199-203, July 2007