Journal of Surgical Education
Volume 64, Issue 3 , Pages 138-142, May 2007

Assessing Surgical Knowledge: A Primer on the Examination Policies of the American Board of Surgery

American Board of Surgery, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Specialty board certification is very important to both physicians and patients. Although certification does not imply or assess competence per se, it does positively correlate with other quality measures. The assessment of knowledge is a critical part of certification by the American Board of Surgery (ABS) because knowledge is fundamental to understanding, judgment, and clinical decision making in surgery. The relationship between knowledge and performance is underscored by advances in the field of cognitive psychology.

Given the importance of certification, ABS examination development and scoring processes use widely accepted psychometric principles to ensure a high degree of validity and reliability. The ABS also closely monitors the examinations to maintain the integrity of the examination process. This article details some processes the ABS uses to achieve these ends.

Key Words: American Board of Surgery, board certification, examination development, unethical behavior

Competency: Medical Knowledge, Professionalism, Practice Based Learning and Improvement

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1931-7204(07)00062-1

doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2007.03.005

Journal of Surgical Education
Volume 64, Issue 3 , Pages 138-142, May 2007